| Title |
Test–Retest Reproducibility Analysis of Lung CT Image Features
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-014-9716-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoganand Balagurunathan, Virendra Kumar, Yuhua Gu, Jongphil Kim, Hua Wang, Ying Liu, Dmitry B. Goldgof, Lawrence O. Hall, Rene Korn, Binsheng Zhao, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Satrajit Basu, Steven Eschrich, Robert A. Gatenby, Robert J. Gillies |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 20% |
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 31% |
| Engineering | 23 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,475,808
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#338
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,623
of 227,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.