| Title |
Perceived Risk Following Melanoma Genetic Testing: A 2‐Year Prospective Study Distinguishing Subjective Estimates from Recall
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetic Counseling, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10897-013-9676-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa G. Aspinwall, Jennifer M. Taber, Wendy Kohlmann, Samantha L. Leaf, Sancy A. Leachman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,362,987
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#773
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,710
of 307,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.