↓ Skip to main content

Limiting the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico's obesogenic environment: A qualitative policy review and stakeholder analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Limiting the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico's obesogenic environment: A qualitative policy review and stakeholder analysis
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, June 2011
DOI 10.1057/jphp.2011.39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalie Moise, Enrique Cifuentes, Emanuel Orozco, Walter Willett

Abstract

Mexico is building a legal framework to address its childhood obesity epidemic. Sugar sweetened beverages (SSB) in the school environment represent a major policy challenge. We addressed the following questions: What barriers inhibit political attention to SSB and childhood obesity? What political instruments, international and national, exist to guide agenda setting in Mexico? What opportunities exist for policy adoption? We conducted a systematic review of international and national legal instruments concerned with SSB consumption. We traced process, conducting interviews with key informants. Thematic analysis helped us identify barriers and opportunities for public health interventions. We found 11 national policy instruments, but detected implementation gaps and weak fiscal policies on SSB consumption in schools: limited drinking water infrastructure, SSB industry interests, and regulatory ambiguities addressing reduction of sugar in beverages. Public policy should target marketing practices and taxation. The school environment remains a promising target for policy. Access to safe drinking water must complement comprehensive and multi-sector policy approaches to reduce access to SSB.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 212 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 24%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 25%
Social Sciences 34 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 52 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,667,001
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#214
of 776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,267
of 112,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.