↓ Skip to main content

Smart Specialisation: what gets lost in translation from concept to practice?

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Studies, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,881)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
74 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smart Specialisation: what gets lost in translation from concept to practice?
Published in
Regional Studies, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970
Authors

Carlo Gianelle, Fabrizio Guzzo, Krzysztof Mieszkowski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 12%
Engineering 4 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#653,200
of 25,278,281 outputs
Outputs from Regional Studies
#25
of 1,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,292
of 357,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Studies
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,278,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.