| Title |
The role of prosocial behaviors in mate choice: A critical review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Psychology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12144-019-00308-8 |
| Authors |
Manpal Singh Bhogal, Daniel Farrelly, Niall Galbraith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 81% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 39% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,115,628
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychology
#120
of 2,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,246
of 365,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychology
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.