| Title |
ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Heart Failure JACC Guideline Comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.478 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter van der Meer, Hanna K. Gaggin, G. William Dec |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 15% |
| Mexico | 9 | 8% |
| Spain | 8 | 8% |
| Colombia | 6 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 15% |
| Scientists | 11 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 362 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 9% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 19% |
| Unknown | 127 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 44% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Unknown | 128 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#631,221
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,602
of 16,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,583
of 364,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#55
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.