You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fixed recurrence and slip models better predict earthquake behavior than the time‐ and slip‐predictable models: 1. Repeating earthquakes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2011jb008724 |
| Authors |
Justin L. Rubinstein, William L. Ellsworth, Kate H. Chen, Naoki Uchida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 29% |
| Researcher | 24 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 65 | 71% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#3,601
of 12,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,732
of 168,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#98
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.