↓ Skip to main content

Case study: Is bisphenol S safer than bisphenol A in thermal papers?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Case study: Is bisphenol S safer than bisphenol A in thermal papers?
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00204-019-02474-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel A. Sogorb, Jorge Estévez, Eugenio Vilanova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 16 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 19 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,025,207
of 23,751,351 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#1,902
of 2,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,287
of 352,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#19
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,751,351 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.