↓ Skip to main content

Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythms in fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
Title
Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythms in fishes
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, December 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1025371804611
Authors

Stephan G. Reebs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 424 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 17%
Student > Bachelor 63 14%
Student > Master 60 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 4%
Other 72 16%
Unknown 64 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 244 54%
Environmental Science 74 17%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Engineering 5 1%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 81 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#389
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,214
of 135,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.