You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Smoking, Alcohol, and Biliary Tract Cancer Risk: A Pooling Project of 26 Prospective Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djz103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma E McGee, Sarah S Jackson, Jessica L Petrick, Alison L Van Dyke, Hans-Olov Adami, Demetrius Albanes, Gabriella Andreotti, Laura E Beane-Freeman, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez, Julie E Buring, Andrew T Chan, Yu Chen, Gary E Fraser, Neal D Freedman, Yu-Tang Gao, Susan M Gapstur, J Michael Gaziano, Graham G Giles, Eric J Grant, Francine Grodstein, Patricia Hartge, Mazda Jenab, Cari M Kitahara, Synnove F Knutsen, Woon-Puay Koh, Susanna C Larsson, I-Min Lee, Linda M Liao, Juhua Luo, Roger L Milne, Kristine R Monroe, Marian L Neuhouser, Katie M O’Brien, Ulrike Peters, Jenny N Poynter, Mark P Purdue, Kim Robien, Dale P Sandler, Norie Sawada, Catherine Schairer, Howard D Sesso, Tracey G Simon, Rashmi Sinha, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Shochiro Tsugane, Renwei Wang, Elisabete Weiderpass, Stephanie J Weinstein, Emily White, Alicja Wolk, Jian-Min Yuan, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Xuehong Zhang, Bin Zhu, Katherine A McGlynn, Peter T Campbell, Jill Koshiol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 59% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,771,768
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,150
of 7,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,759
of 366,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#21
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.