↓ Skip to main content

Nerve fibre proliferation in interstitial cystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv A Pathological anatomy and histopathology, September 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 169)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Nerve fibre proliferation in interstitial cystitis
Published in
Virchows Archiv A Pathological anatomy and histopathology, September 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01605152
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. J. Christmas, J. Rode, C. R. Chapple, E. J. G. Milroy, R. T. Turner-Warwick

Abstract

The aetiology of pain in interstitial cystitis is not understood, although it has been reported to be due to release of mediators from mast cell granules. Cystolysis and intravesical instillation of dimethyl sulphoxide have been shown to relieve pain in this condition. We have studied the nerve population within the bladder wall using immunohistochemical stains for protein gene product 9.5. A group of 18 cases of chronic interstitial cystitis and 12 controls; neuropathic bladder (n = 1), chronic bacterial cystitis (n = 3), systemic lupus erythematosus cystitis (n = 2) and normals (n = 6), were investigated. There were significantly more nerve fibres within the sub-urothelial and detrusor muscle layers in chronic interstitial cystitis than there were in normals. Patients with chronic cystitis of other aetiology did not have a significant increase in nerve fibre density within the bladder wall suggesting a specific association between nerve fibre proliferation and interstitial cystitis. Cystolysis is shown to deplete selectively the submucosal nerve plexuses without altering the nerve density within detrusor muscle. This finding explains the desensitisation of the bladder without impairment of detrusor function after this procedure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Psychology 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv A Pathological anatomy and histopathology
#28
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,305
of 14,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv A Pathological anatomy and histopathology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them