↓ Skip to main content

Prävalenz und Schwere der Lungenarterienembolie in Abhängigkeit von klinischen und paraklinischen Parametern

Overview of attention for article published in Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Prävalenz und Schwere der Lungenarterienembolie in Abhängigkeit von klinischen und paraklinischen Parametern
Published in
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00063-016-0144-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Kocea, K. Mischke, H.-P. Volk, U. Eberle, J. R. Ortlepp

Abstract

Patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) have heterogeneous symptoms. Clinical scores and age-adjusted D‑dimer should help clinicians to establish the correct diagnosis. A cohort of 1,943 consecutive patients with positive D‑dimer levels who were referred for CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) over a period of 5 years to rule PE in or out were retrospectively analyzed. On CTPA n = 362 (19 %) had PE. The prevalence of PE increased stepwise with increasing D‑dimer levels (prevalence of PE with 10 percentiles of D‑dimers was: 3 %, 4 %, 7 %, 8 %, 8 %, 21 %, 20 %, 27 %, 37 %, 52 %; p < 0.001). D‑dimers > 2.0 were significantly associated with PE (OR 7.17 95 % CI 5.27-9.76, p < 0.001). Chest discomfort and tachypnea showed no association with PE. Dyspnoea, pleuritic pain, and general fatigue showed significant associations with age: pleuritic chest pain was more frequent in patients aged < 76 years than in patients aged > 76 years (15 % vs 3 %; p < 0.001) and was highly significantly associated with PE (OR 4.99 95 % CI 2.83-8.81; p < 0.001). General fatigue was more prevalent in patients aged > 76 years (44 % vs 24 %; p < 0.001). PE patients with D‑dimers > 6.0 mg/l were hemodynamically more compromised than patients with D‑dimers < 6.0 mg/l: tachycardia 32 % vs 20 %, p = 0.015; right ventricular strain on echocardiography: 38 % vs 23 %, p = 0.003; right ventricular strain on ECG: 27 % vs 13 %; p  = 0.001; resuscitation 4 % vs 0 %, p = 0.003; lytic therapy 6 % vs 1 %, p = 0.014. The symptoms of PE patients are often vague. Particularly in older patients, fatigue may be the only symptom. The absolute level of D‑dimers, particularly > 2.0 mg/l, is a strong predictor of PE. A D‑dimer level > 6.0 mg/l is associated with more severe hemodynamic impairment in patients with PE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 83%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,791,786
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
#178
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,999
of 298,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.