↓ Skip to main content

Medikamenteninduzierte Dysphagien

Overview of attention for article published in HNO, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Medikamenteninduzierte Dysphagien
Published in
HNO, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00106-015-0015-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Schwemmle, M. Jungheim, S. Miller, D. Kühn, M. Ptok

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,572,330
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from HNO
#326
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,707
of 262,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HNO
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.