| Title |
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-016-3492-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Thorell, A. D. MacCormick, S. Awad, N. Reynolds, D. Roulin, N. Demartines, M. Vignaud, A. Alvarez, P. M. Singh, D. N. Lobo |
| Abstract |
During the last two decades, an increasing number of bariatric surgical procedures have been performed worldwide. There is no consensus regarding optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery. This review aims to present such a consensus and to provide graded recommendations for elements in an evidence-based "enhanced" perioperative protocol. The English-language literature between January 1966 and January 2015 was searched, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached a consensus recommendation. Although for some elements, recommendations are extrapolated from non-bariatric settings (mainly colorectal), most recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials. A comprehensive evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society. The guidelines were endorsed by the International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) and based on the evidence available in the literature for each of the elements of the multimodal perioperative care pathway for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 560 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 555 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 12% |
| Other | 60 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 11% |
| Researcher | 52 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 51 | 9% |
| Other | 129 | 23% |
| Unknown | 141 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 288 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 37 | 7% |
| Unknown | 159 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,753,838
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#185
of 4,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,984
of 316,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.