You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating transfection efficiency in differentiated and undifferentiated neural cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-019-4249-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abeer A. Alabdullah, Basma Al-Abdulaziz, Hanan Alsalem, Amna Magrashi, Subramanian M. Pulicat, Amer A. Almzroua, Falah Almohanna, Abdullah Mohamed Assiri, Nada A. Al Tassan, Bashayer R. Al-Mubarak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,955,771
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,809
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,450
of 350,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#30
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.