↓ Skip to main content

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant with reduced-intensity conditioning for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Sweden: does donor T-cell engraftment 3 months after transplant predict survival?

Overview of attention for article published in Leukemia & Lymphoma, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant with reduced-intensity conditioning for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Sweden: does donor T-cell engraftment 3 months after transplant predict survival?
Published in
Leukemia & Lymphoma, March 2012
DOI 10.3109/10428194.2012.666661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maciej Machaczka, Jan-Erik Johansson, Mats Remberger, Helene Hallböök, Claes Malm, Vladimir Lj Lazarevic, Anders Wahlin, Hamdy Omar, Gunnar Juliusson, Eva Kimby, Hans Hägglund

Abstract

Thirty-eight adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) underwent reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) in Sweden between 1999 and 2007. The cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV and chronic GVHD were 29% and 47%, respectively. Rates of non-relapse mortality, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18%, 47% and 74% at 1 year, and 21%, 25% and 45% at 5 years, respectively. T-cell chimerism after transplant was measured in 31 out of 34 patients (91%) surviving beyond day +100. Seventeen patients achieved >90% donor T-cell engraftment at 3 months after allo-SCT and, compared with the 12 patients with ≤90% donor T-cell engraftment, they showed favorable PFS at 1 year (82% vs. 33%, p =0.002) and better long-term PFS and OS (p =0.002 and 0.046, respectively). Donor T-cell engraftment of >90% at 3 months after RIC allo-SCT for CLL seems to predict favorable short-term and long-term outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 36%
Professor 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Mathematics 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Leukemia & Lymphoma
#2,768
of 3,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,512
of 158,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leukemia & Lymphoma
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.