↓ Skip to main content

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and low levels of natriuretic peptides

Overview of attention for article published in Netherlands Heart Journal, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and low levels of natriuretic peptides
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12471-016-0816-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. C. Meijers, T. Hoekstra, T. Jaarsma, D. J. van Veldhuisen, R. A. de Boer

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and its management remains difficult. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are used to diagnose heart failure, and as an entry criterion for inclusion into trials. We investigated a population of HFpEF patients who had been randomised into a study based on clinical parameters, and compared those with low BNP levels to those with elevated BNP levels. We examined patients who had been enrolled in the Coordinating study evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counselling in Heart Failure (COACH), with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40 %), and compared those with low BNP (< 100 pg/ml; n = 30) to those with elevated BNP (≥ 100 pg/ml; n = 127). Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, biomarkers, quality of life, and outcome parameters (hospitalisations and death) were compared between the groups. To validate our findings, we repeated all analyses for NT-proBNP (< 300 pg/ml and ≥ 300 pg/ml). Patients were similar with regard to most clinical characteristics (including age, sex, and LVEF), biomarkers, and comorbidities. In contrast, patients with a low BNP had higher body mass index levels (31 kg/m(2) vs. 27 kg/m(2); p < 0.01) and lower cardiac troponin I (9 pg/ml vs. 15 pg/ml; p = 0.02). In addition, these patients were less frequently prescribed diuretics and beta-blockers. No differences in quality of life, heart failure related symptoms and the primary and secondary outcomes were observed between these groups. These observations were confirmed for NT-proBNP. Among the patients with clinically diagnosed HFpEF, those with low BNP are strikingly similar to those with elevated BNP levels, except for BMI, which was significantly higher in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,227,036
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Netherlands Heart Journal
#232
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,179
of 298,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Netherlands Heart Journal
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.