↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying consistent individual differences in habitat selection

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying consistent individual differences in habitat selection
Published in
Oecologia, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3500-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Leclerc, Eric Vander Wal, Andreas Zedrosser, Jon E. Swenson, Jonas Kindberg, Fanie Pelletier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 289 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Researcher 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Other 14 5%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 51%
Environmental Science 57 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 64 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,855
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,054
of 399,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#21
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.