↓ Skip to main content

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Ribavirin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Ribavirin
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.01.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Navid Goodarzi, Ahmadreza Barazesh Morgani, Bertil Abrahamsson, Rodrigo Cristofoletti, D.W. Groot, Peter Langguth, Mehul U. Mehta, James E. Polli, Vinod P. Shah, Jennifer B. Dressman

Abstract

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing ribavirin are reviewed. Ribavirin is highly soluble, but its permeability characteristics are not well defined. Therefore according to the Biopharmaceutical Classification System, and taking a "worst case" approach, ribavirin should be assigned to class III. As ribavirin is transported across the brush border membrane of the human jejunum by hCNT2, it shows saturable uptake in the intestine. However, no common excipients have been shown to compete for ribavirin absorption, nor have problems with BE of immediate release ribavirin formulations containing different excipients and/or produced by different manufacturing methods been reported in the open literature. So the risk of bioinequivalence caused by these factors appears to be low. Ribavirin is considered a narrow therapeutic index drug, as judged by comparing the minimum effective concentration and minimum toxic concentrations in blood. Although ribavirin would not be eligible for approval via a Biopharmaceutical Classification System-based biowaiver procedure according to today's guidances due to its narrow therapeutic index, the risks of biowaiving should be weighed against the considerable risks associated with studying BE of ribavirin products in healthy subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 12 25%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Chemistry 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#5,533
of 6,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,114
of 313,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#46
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,257 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.