↓ Skip to main content

The role of epigenetics in idiopathic male infertility

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
The role of epigenetics in idiopathic male infertility
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10815-016-0682-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sezgin Gunes, Mehmet Alper Arslan, Gulgez Neslihan Taskurt Hekim, Ramazan Asci

Abstract

Infertility is a complex disorder with multiple genetic and environmental causes. Although some specific mutations have been identified, other factors responsible for sperm defects remain largely unknown. Despite considerable efforts to identify the pathophysiology of the disease, we cannot explain the underlying mechanisms of approximately half of infertility cases. This study reviews current data on epigenetic regulation and idiopathic male infertility. Recent data have shown an association between epigenetic modifications and idiopathic infertility. In this regard, epigenetics has emerged as one of the promising research areas in understanding male infertility. Many studies have indicated that epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation in imprinted and developmental genes, histone tail modifications and short non-coding RNAs in spermatozoa may have a role in idiopathic male infertility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,426,096
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#512
of 1,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,710
of 304,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.