Title |
Effects of a Transitional Care Practice for a Vulnerable Population: a Pragmatic, Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05078-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David T. Liss, Ronald T. Ackermann, Andrew Cooper, Emily A. Finch, Courtney Hurt, Nicola Lancki, Angela Rogers, Avani Sheth, Caroline Teter, Christine Schaeffer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 67% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Librarian | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 34 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 40 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,417,864
of 24,088,270 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,466
of 7,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,303
of 353,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#75
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.