↓ Skip to main content

Human Probing Behavior of Aedes aegypti when Infected with a Life-Shortening Strain of Wolbachia

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Probing Behavior of Aedes aegypti when Infected with a Life-Shortening Strain of Wolbachia
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciano A. Moreira, Emad Saig, Andrew P. Turley, José M. C. Ribeiro, Scott L. O'Neill, Elizabeth A. McGraw

Abstract

Mosquitoes are vectors of many serious pathogens in tropical and sub-tropical countries. Current control strategies almost entirely rely upon insecticides, which increasingly face the problems of high cost, increasing mosquito resistance and negative effects on non-target organisms. Alternative strategies include the proposed use of inherited life-shortening agents, such as the Wolbachia bacterium. By shortening mosquito vector lifespan, Wolbachia could potentially reduce the vectorial capacity of mosquito populations. We have recently been able to stably transinfect Aedes aegypti mosquitoes with the life-shortening Wolbachia strain wMelPop, and are assessing various aspects of its interaction with the mosquito host to determine its likely impact on pathogen transmission as well as its potential ability to invade A. aegypti populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 178 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 12 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 27 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,446,047
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#1,631
of 9,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,257
of 174,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.