↓ Skip to main content

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis identifies specific modules and hub genes related to coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weighted gene co-expression network analysis identifies specific modules and hub genes related to coronary artery disease
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12872-016-0217-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Liu, Ling Jing, Xilin Tu

Abstract

The analysis of the potential molecule targets of coronary artery disease (CAD) is critical for understanding the molecular mechanisms of disease. However, studies of global microarray gene co-expression analysis of CAD still remain limited. Microarray data of CAD (GSE23561) were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus, including peripheral blood samples from CAD patients (n = 6) and controls (n = 9). Limma package in R was used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CAD and control samples. Using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) package in R, WGCNA was performed to identify significant modules in the network. Then, functional and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted for genes in the most significant module using DAVID software. Moreover, hub genes in the module were analyzed by isubpathwayminer package in R and GenCLiP 2.0 tool to identify the significant sub-pathways. Total 3711 DEGs and 21 modules for them were identified in CAD samples. The most significant module was associated with the pathways of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and membrane related functions. In addition, the top 30 hub genes with high connectivity in the module were selected, and two genes (G6PD and S100A7) were taken as key molecules via sub-pathway screening and data mining. A module associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathway was detected in CAD samples. G6PD and S100A7 were the potential targets in CAD. Our finding might provide novel insight into the underlying molecular mechanism of CAD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 5%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Computer Science 6 7%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,099,609
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#882
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,681
of 301,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.