↓ Skip to main content

Impact of milling, enzyme addition, and steam explosion on the solid waste biomethanation of an olive oil production plant

Overview of attention for article published in Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Impact of milling, enzyme addition, and steam explosion on the solid waste biomethanation of an olive oil production plant
Published in
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00449-015-1519-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Donoso-Bravo, E. Ortega-Martinez, G. Ruiz-Filippi

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is a consolidated bioprocess which can be further enhanced by incorporating an upstream pretreatment unit. The olive oil production produces a large amount of solid waste which needs to be properly managed and disposed. Three different pretreatment techniques were evaluated in regard to their impact on the anaerobic biodegradability: manual milling of olive pomace (OP), enzyme maceration, direct enzyme addition, and thermal hydrolysis of two-phase olive mill waste. The Gompertz equation was used to obtain parameters for comparison purposes. A substrate/inoculum ratio 0.5 was found to be the best to be used in anaerobic batch test with olive pomace as substrate. Mechanical pretreatment of OP by milling increases the methane production rate while keeping the maximum methane yield. The enzymatic pretreatment showed different results depending on the chosen pretreatment strategies. After the enzymatic maceration pretreatment, a methane production of 274 ml CH4 g VS added (-1) was achieved, which represents an improvement of 32 and 71 % compared to the blank and control, respectively. The direct enzyme addition pretreatment showed no improvement in both the rate and the maximum methane production. Steam explosion showed no improvement on the anaerobic degradability of two-phase olive mill waste; however, thermal hydrolysis with no rapid depressurization enhanced notoriously both the maximum rate (50 %) and methane yield (70 %).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 17%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Chemical Engineering 5 12%
Energy 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,348,622
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#8
of 8 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,814
of 396,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.