↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a low–glycemic index diet during pregnancy on offspring growth, body composition, and vascular health: a pilot randomized controlled trial 1

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of a low–glycemic index diet during pregnancy on offspring growth, body composition, and vascular health: a pilot randomized controlled trial 1
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, March 2016
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.115.123695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalie V Kizirian, Yang Kong, Roslyn Muirhead, Shannon Brodie, Sarah P Garnett, Peter Petocz, Kyra A Sim, David S Celermajer, Jimmy C Y Louie, Tania P Markovic, Glynis P Ross, Leigh C Ward, Jennie C Brand-Miller, Michael R Skilton

Abstract

Elevated maternal blood glucose concentrations may contribute to macrosomia, adiposity, and poorer vascular health in the offspring. The aim was to explore the effect of a low-glycemic index (low-GI) diet during pregnancy on offspring growth, adiposity, and arterial wall thickness during infancy. This was a longitudinal follow-up study in a self-selected subgroup of mother-infant pairs (n = 59) participating in a larger randomized trial comparing the effects on perinatal outcomes of a low-GI diet and a conventional high-fiber (HF) diet during pregnancy. Infant anthropometric measurements were taken every month for 6 mo and then at 9 and 12 mo of age. Adiposity was assessed at birth and at 3 mo by air-displacement plethysmography by using the Pea Pod system (Cosmed) and at 6 and 12 mo by bioimpedance analysis (Bodystat). Aortic intima-media thickness was assessed at 12 mo by high-resolution ultrasound (Philips). Maternal dietary GI was lower in the low-GI group than in the HF group (51 ± 1 compared with 57 ± 1; P < 0.001). No differences in neonatal outcomes were observed in the main trial. In the self-selected subsample, birth weight and length z scores were lower in the low-GI group than in the HF group (birth weight z score: 0.2 ± 0.2 compared with 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively; P = 0.04; birth length z score: 0.3 ± 0.2 compared with 0.9 ± 0.2, respectively; P = 0.04), but adiposity from birth to 12 mo of age and growth trajectories from 1 to 12 mo of age were similar. Aortic intima-media thickness was lower in the low-GI group than in the HF group (657 ±12 compared with 696 ± 12 μm, respectively; P = 0.02), which was partly mediated by differences in birth weight. In women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, a low-GI diet influences offspring birth weight, birth length, and arterial wall thickness in early childhood, but not adiposity or growth trajectory during the first year of life. This trial was registered at anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12610000681055.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Researcher 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 64 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 75 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,806,753
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#7,400
of 12,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,053
of 313,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#68
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.