| Title |
Generating Real-World Tumor Burden Endpoints from Electronic Health Record Data: Comparison of RECIST, Radiology-Anchored, and Clinician-Anchored Approaches for Abstracting Real-World Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Therapy, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12325-019-00970-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra D. Griffith, Melisa Tucker, Bryan Bowser, Geoffrey Calkins, Che-hsu (Joe) Chang, Ellie Guardino, Sean Khozin, Josh Kraut, Paul You, Deb Schrag, Rebecca A. Miksad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| Kenya | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,435,632
of 25,070,356 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#585
of 2,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,045
of 356,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#17
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,070,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.