↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive Imaging Modalities and Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the Young: Can They Help Distinguish Subjects With a Potentially Life-Threatening Abnormality From Normals?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive Imaging Modalities and Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the Young: Can They Help Distinguish Subjects With a Potentially Life-Threatening Abnormality From Normals?
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00246-012-0169-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth Feller Printz

Abstract

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the young is always tragic, but fortunately it is an unusual event. When it does occur, it usually happens in active individuals, often while they are participating in physical activity. Depending on the population's characteristics, the most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest in these subjects are hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital coronary abnormalities, arrhythmia in the presence of a structurally normal heart (ion channelopathies or abnormal conduction pathways), aortic rupture, and arrhythmogenic right-ventricular cardiomyopathy. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2-DE) has been proposed as a screening tool that can potentially detect four of these five causes of SCA, and many groups now sponsor community-based 2-DE SCA-screening programs. "Basic" 2-DE screening may include assessment of ventricular volumes, mass, and function; left atrial size; and cardiac and thoracic vascular (including coronary) anatomy. "Advanced" echocardiographic techniques, such as tissue Doppler and strain imaging, can help in diagnosis when the history, electrocardiogram (ECG), and/or standard 2-DE screening suggest there may be an abnormality, e.g., to help differentiate those with "athlete's heart" from hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or cardiac computed tomography can be added to increase diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in select cases when an abnormality is suggested during SCA screening. Test availability, cost, and ethical issues related to who to screen, as well as the detection of those with potential disease but low risk, must be balanced when deciding what tests to perform to assess for increased SCA risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Qatar 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#649
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,703
of 250,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.