↓ Skip to main content

A survey of lung cancer in rural and remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Queensland: health views that impact on early diagnosis and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Internal Medicine Journal, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A survey of lung cancer in rural and remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Queensland: health views that impact on early diagnosis and treatment
Published in
Internal Medicine Journal, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/imj.12948
Pubmed ID
Authors

B J Page, R V Bowman, I A Yang, K M Fong

Abstract

Lung cancer incidence, mortality and hospitalisation rates are higher for Indigenous Australians compared to non-Indigenous Australians and increase again when living in more remote areas. If Indigenous Australians are made more aware of lung cancer through better access to health services and programs, lung cancer outcomes might improve. We aimed to survey the level of lung cancer awareness in rural and remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and discover perceived barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Interviews were conducted in three discrete outer regional and remote Aboriginal communities and one urban setting in Queensland. Participants included Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples from three target population groups: patients referred for medical treatment with symptoms suspicious of lung cancer or confirmed lung cancer); Indigenous health workers; community members aged 18 years and over. Participants gave written, informed consent. Of 51 community members and 14 Indigenous health workers , 32 reflected they knew very little about lung cancer, 60 cited smoking as the cause of lung cancer and 54 recognised warning symptoms as a prompt to seek health care. Indigenous health workers were not able to describe a health care pathway that would apply to a patient with suspected lung cancer. The two main barriers identified as impacting on quality health care were communication and follow-up processes. These could be addressed by service improvement activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,276,745
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine Journal
#2,006
of 2,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,900
of 304,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine Journal
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.