↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenesis and Management of Nasal Polyposis in Cystic Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Pathogenesis and Management of Nasal Polyposis in Cystic Fibrosis
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11882-012-0250-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jochen G. Mainz, Assen Koitschev

Abstract

Beginning in preschool age, during their lives, up to 50% of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients experience obstructing nasal polyposis (NP), which is rare in non-CF children. Pathogenetic factors of NP in general and especially in CF are still obscure. However, defective epithelial ion transport from mucosal glands plays a central role in CF, and viscous secretions impair mucociliary clearance, promoting chronic pathogen colonization and neutrophil-dominated chronic inflammation. Presently, CF-NP is not curable but can be clinically stabilized, though the large variety of proposed treatment modalities indicates a lack of standardization and of evidence of treatment efficacy. When conservative measures are exhausted, surgical intervention combining individually adapted endoscopic sinus surgery and supportive conservative treatment is performed. Topical steroids, approved as the gold standard for non-CF NP, may be beneficial, but they are discussed to be less effective in neutrophilic inflammation, and CF-specific antimicrobial and mucolytic therapy, as is true of all treatment modalities, urgently requires evaluation by controlled clinical trials within interdisciplinary networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,335,507
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#271
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,823
of 156,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.