↓ Skip to main content

Cranial Shape and the Modularity of Hybridization in Dingoes and Dogs; Hybridization Does Not Spell the End for Native Morphology

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Biology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 325)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Cranial Shape and the Modularity of Hybridization in Dingoes and Dogs; Hybridization Does Not Spell the End for Native Morphology
Published in
Evolutionary Biology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11692-016-9371-x
Authors

William C. H. Parr, Laura A. B. Wilson, Stephen Wroe, Nicholas J. Colman, Mathew S. Crowther, Mike Letnic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 46%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#317,724
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#4
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,868
of 304,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them