↓ Skip to main content

Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists’ Work and Lives

Overview of attention for article published in Minerva, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 433)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists’ Work and Lives
Published in
Minerva, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11024-016-9292-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian Fochler, Ulrike Felt, Ruth Müller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,025,874
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#15
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,284
of 314,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them