↓ Skip to main content

Predictions of fate from rosette size in teasel (Dipsacus fullonum L.)

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Predictions of fate from rosette size in teasel (Dipsacus fullonum L.)
Published in
Oecologia, September 1975
DOI 10.1007/bf00347472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A. Werner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
China 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 52 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Professor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 59%
Environmental Science 11 19%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,331
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#897
of 4,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them