↓ Skip to main content

The Healthy Immigrant Paradox and Child Maltreatment: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
The Healthy Immigrant Paradox and Child Maltreatment: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-016-0373-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lina S. Millett

Abstract

Prior studies suggest that foreign-born individuals have a health advantage, referred to as the Healthy Immigrant Paradox, when compared to native-born persons of the same socio-economic status. This systematic review examined whether the immigrant advantage found in health literature is mirrored by child maltreatment in general and its forms in particular. The author searched Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, CINAHL PLUS, Family and Society Studies Worldwide, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and SocINdex for published literature through December 2015. The review followed an evidence-based Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The author identified 822 unique articles, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria. The reviewed data showed strong support for the healthy immigrant paradox for a general form of maltreatment and physical abuse. The evidence for emotional and sexual abuse was also suggestive of immigrant advantage though relatively small sample size and lack of multivariate controls make these findings tentative. The evidence for neglect was mixed: immigrants were less likely to be reported to Child Protective Services; however, they had higher rates of physical neglect and lack of supervision in the community data. The study results warrant confirmation with newer data possessing strong external validity for immigrant samples.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 22%
Psychology 17 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 34 36%