↓ Skip to main content

Strategic and Regulatory Approaches to Increasing Women in Leadership: Multilevel Targets and Mandatory Quotas as Levers for Cultural Change

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
Title
Strategic and Regulatory Approaches to Increasing Women in Leadership: Multilevel Targets and Mandatory Quotas as Levers for Cultural Change
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2069-z
Authors

Alice Klettner, Thomas Clarke, Martijn Boersma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 292 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 19%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Researcher 18 6%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 83 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 115 39%
Social Sciences 41 14%
Psychology 17 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 4%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 86 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,217,444
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#391
of 2,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,712
of 307,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.