↓ Skip to main content

Radiological evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas – Current methods and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiological evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas – Current methods and future prospects
Published in
Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.beem.2011.07.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. McDermott, O.J. O’Connor, C.G. Cronin, M.A. Blake

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Other 12 30%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 75%
Psychology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
#677
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,114
of 253,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.