↓ Skip to main content

Challenges to Providing Fetal Anomaly Testing in a Cross‐Cultural Environment: Experiences of Practitioners Caring for Aboriginal Women

Overview of attention for article published in Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges to Providing Fetal Anomaly Testing in a Cross‐Cultural Environment: Experiences of Practitioners Caring for Aboriginal Women
Published in
Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, August 2015
DOI 10.1111/birt.12182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice R Rumbold, Kayli J Wild, Elaine Lawurrpa Maypilama, Sue V Kildea, Lesley Barclay, Euan M Wallace, Jacqueline A Boyle

Abstract

Across Australia there are substantial disparities in uptake of antenatal testing for fetal anomalies, with very low uptake observed among Aboriginal women. The reasons behind these disparities are unclear, although poorer access to testing has been reported in some communities. We interviewed health care practitioners to explore the perceived barriers to providing fetal anomaly screening to Aboriginal women. In 2009 and 2010, in-depth interviews were undertaken with 59 practitioners in five urban and remote sites across the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. Data were analyzed thematically. Maximum variation sampling, independent review of findings by multiple analysts, and participant feedback were undertaken to strengthen the validity of findings. Participants included midwives (47%), Aboriginal health practitioners (AHP) (32%), general practitioners (12%), and obstetricians (9%); almost all (95%) were female. Participants consistently reported difficulties counseling women. Explaining the concept of "risk" (of abnormalities and the screening test result) was identified as particularly challenging, because of a perceived lack of an equivalent concept in Aboriginal languages. While AHPs could assist with overcoming language barriers, they are underutilized. Participants also identified impediments to organizing testing including difficulties establishing gestational age, late presentation for care, and a lack of standardized information and training. The availability of fetal anomaly testing is challenged by communication difficulties, including a focus on culturally specific biomedical concepts, and organizational barriers to arranging testing. Developing educational activities that address the technical aspects of screening and communication skills will assist in improving access. These activities must include AHPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 37 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care
#980
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,096
of 275,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.