↓ Skip to main content

Spirometric Reference Values from a Sample of the General U.S. Population

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3573 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
827 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spirometric Reference Values from a Sample of the General U.S. Population
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, January 1999
DOI 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9712108
Pubmed ID
Authors

JOHN L. HANKINSON, JOHN R. ODENCRANTZ, KATHLEEN B. FEDAN

Abstract

Spirometric reference values for Caucasians, African-Americans, and Mexican-Americans 8 to 80 yr of age were developed from 7,429 asymptomatic, lifelong nonsmoking participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Spirometry examinations followed the 1987 American Thoracic Society recommendations, and the quality of the data was continuously monitored and maintained. Caucasian subjects had higher mean FVC and FEV1 values than did Mexican-American and African-American subjects across the entire age range. However, Caucasian and Mexican-American subjects had similar FVC and FEV1 values with respect to height, and African-American subjects had lower values. These differences may be partially due to differences in body build: observed Mexican-Americans were shorter than Caucasian subjects of the same age, and African-Americans on average have a smaller trunk:leg ratio than do Caucasians. Reference values and lower limits of normal were derived using a piecewise polynomial model with age and height as predictors. These reference values encompass a wide age range for three race/ethnic groups and should prove useful for diagnostic and research purposes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 827 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 801 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 130 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 13%
Student > Master 105 13%
Student > Postgraduate 71 9%
Other 62 7%
Other 200 24%
Unknown 154 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 366 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 5%
Environmental Science 30 4%
Sports and Recreations 29 4%
Other 126 15%
Unknown 186 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#628,910
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#464
of 12,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#445
of 111,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#1
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.