| Title |
Close encounters with buildings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
URBAN DESIGN International, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000162 |
| Authors |
Jan Gehl, Lotte Johansen Kaefer, Solvejg Reigstad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 18% |
| Researcher | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 61 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 44 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 43 | 16% |
| Engineering | 28 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 65 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,118,989
of 24,223,370 outputs
Outputs from URBAN DESIGN International
#28
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,287
of 54,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from URBAN DESIGN International
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,223,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them