↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D and Neurological Disorders: The Conundrum Continues

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D and Neurological Disorders: The Conundrum Continues
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12098-019-02992-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prabhjot Kaur, Biswaroop Chakrabarty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Psychology 1 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,683,314
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1,138
of 1,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,692
of 350,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.