| Title |
A pilot survey of ventilated cancer patients’ perspectives and recollections of early mobility in the intensive care unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-019-04867-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven H. Hsu, Claudine Campbell, Amanda K. Weeks, Maryann Herklotz, Natalie Kostelecky, Stephen M. Pastores, Neil A. Halpern, Louis P. Voigt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 24% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,723,764
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#207
of 5,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,719
of 367,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#8
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.