| Title |
I SURVIVE: inter-rater reliability of three physical functional outcome measures in intensive care unit survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-019-01411-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Aileen Costigan, Bram Rochwerg, Alexander J. Molloy, Magda McCaughan, Tina Millen, Julie C. Reid, Chris Farley, Laurel Patterson, Michelle E. Kho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 23% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Researcher | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,571,633
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#400
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,860
of 364,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.