↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11239-016-1345-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael B. Streiff, Giancarlo Agnelli, Jean M. Connors, Mark Crowther, Sabine Eichinger, Renato D. Lopes, Robert D. McBane, Stephan Moll, Jack Ansell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,313,158
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#853
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,281
of 298,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.