↓ Skip to main content

Effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist on the cardiovascular events, mortality, and prostaglandin E2 production by nitrate-induced tolerant rats with acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in EPMA Journal, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist on the cardiovascular events, mortality, and prostaglandin E2 production by nitrate-induced tolerant rats with acute myocardial infarction
Published in
EPMA Journal, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13167-016-0055-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamar Kezeli, Tamari Rukhadze, Nikoloz Gongadze, Galina Sukoyan, Nino Dolidze, Mariam Chipashvili, Makrine Mirziashvili

Abstract

Anti-ischemic effects of NO releasing by nitroglycerin (NTG) and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) are involved in the decrease of vascular remodeling in different cardiovascular diseases. Using a nitrate-free period is still generally required to prevent nitrate tolerance and should be used as the first-line option to maintain adequate symptom control and on an individual basis. Personalized anti-ischemic concerns require the urgent change of paradigm from interventional measures to predictive, preventive, and personalized treatment with organic nitrates and its combination with drugs that may improve prognosis and drugs that can be added for patients who remain symptomatic despite therapy with the other classes of agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of human calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist (CGRP8-37) on cardiohemodynamic events, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) plasma concentration, the severity of ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality occurring during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in NTG-tolerant and nontolerant rats. In the pilot study of efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist (CGRP8-37), 58 male Wistar rats were included. All procedures were performed according to protocols approved by the General Animal Care and Use Committee. Adult male rats underwent surgery to induce AMI by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery or SHAM. ECG was used to confirm myocardial ischemia. In each experiment, a rat was maintained under anesthesia for the duration of the experiment. At the end of the experiment, the rat was killed by an overdose of pentobarbital. All animals in accordance with the received pharmacological agent were randomized into three groups: I-received only NTG, 50 mg/kg daily, s.c. injections b.i.d. 3 days prior to AMI; II-received NTG by the same dose, route, and frequency of administration + CGRP antagonist (CGRP8-37), 10 μg/kg two times daily by a similar period of administration; and III-served as control (C) group without preliminary tolerance to NTG. Subcutaneous injections of NTG (50 mg/kg) 30 min prior to AMI in NTG-tolerant animals (group I) and in NTG-tolerant rats + CGRP antagonist (group II) caused minor changes in blood pressure and heart period that was accompanied before NTG s.c. administration with blunted baroreflex sensitivity in response to i.v. administration of sodium nitroprusside in these groups of rats (0.66 ± 0.05 and 0.56 ± 0.04 ms/mmHg, P < 0.05, respectively) in comparison to C (group III) animals (0.9 ± 0.1 ms/mmHg). AMI 1 h duration was associated with a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and significant mortality in group I (70 %) and especially in group II (90 %) animals at 72 h after reperfusion as compared with group III rats (56 %), that correlated to a decrease of PGE2 plasma content in group II (2.2 ± 0.4 ng/ml, P < 0.001) and group I (3.6 ± 0.2 ng/ml, P < 0.01) vs. control group of rats (4.8 ± 0.3 ng/ml). CGRP could be involved in the mechanism of nitrate tolerance via the inhibition of release of the potent vasodilator CGRP leading to exacerbation of acute myocardial ischemia. The influence of CGRP antagonist could enhance this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,291,311
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from EPMA Journal
#181
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,251
of 303,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPMA Journal
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.