Title |
Sex differences in the association between socioeconomic status and diabetes prevalence and incidence in China: cross-sectional and prospective studies of 0.5 million adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetologia, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00125-019-4896-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hongjiang Wu, Fiona Bragg, Ling Yang, Huaidong Du, Yu Guo, Caroline A. Jackson, Shankuan Zhu, Canqing Yu, Andrea O. Y. Luk, Juliana C. N. Chan, Danijela Gasevic, Liming Li, Zhengming Chen, Sarah H. Wild |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 27% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 32 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 35 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,084,377
of 24,690,130 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,110
of 5,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,504
of 355,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#46
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,690,130 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.