| Title |
Developing Attributes and Attribute-Levels for a Discrete-Choice Experiment: An Example for Interventions of Impulsive Violent Offenders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-019-00484-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stella Nalukwago Settumba, Marian Shanahan, Tony Butler, Peter Schofield, Lise Lafferty, Paul Simpson, Georgina M. Chambers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 33% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,974,815
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#307
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,159
of 351,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.