| Title |
Diversity, genetic structure, and population genomics of the tropical tree Centrolobium tomentosum in remnant and restored Atlantic forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-019-01195-z |
| Authors |
Erick M. G. Cordeiro, Camila Menezes Macrini, Patricia Sanae Sujii, Kaiser Dias Schwarcz, José Baldin Pinheiro, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Maria I. Zucchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#16,853,559
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#911
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,155
of 355,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.