↓ Skip to main content

Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Human Behavior, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,047)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
388 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order
Published in
Law and Human Behavior, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aldert Vrij, Samantha A. Mann, Ronald P. Fisher, Sharon Leal, Rebecca Milne, Ray Bull

Abstract

In two experiments, we tested the hypotheses that (a) the difference between liars and truth tellers will be greater when interviewees report their stories in reverse order than in chronological order, and (b) instructing interviewees to recall their stories in reverse order will facilitate detecting deception. In Experiment 1, 80 mock suspects told the truth or lied about a staged event and did or did not report their stories in reverse order. The reverse order interviews contained many more cues to deceit than the control interviews. In Experiment 2, 55 police officers watched a selection of the videotaped interviews of Experiment 1 and made veracity judgements. Requesting suspects to convey their stories in reverse order improved police observers' ability to detect deception and did not result in a response bias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 5%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 314 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 78 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 18%
Student > Master 59 17%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 45 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 192 56%
Social Sciences 29 8%
Computer Science 14 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 3%
Linguistics 7 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 53 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#897,934
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Law and Human Behavior
#50
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,890
of 97,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Human Behavior
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them