| Title |
A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11605-011-1753-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Mahlon Vollmer, Norberto Sanchez, Stephen Gondek, John McAuliffe, Tara S. Kent, John D. Christein, Mark P. Callery, The Pancreatic Surgery Mortality Study Group |
| Abstract |
Although mortality rates from pancreatectomy have decreased worldwide, death remains an infrequent but profound event at an individual practice level. Root-cause analysis is a retrospective method commonly employed to understand adverse events. We evaluate whether emerging mortality risk assessment tools sufficiently predict and account for actual clinical events that are often identified by root-cause analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 54% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2012.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1,740
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,919
of 155,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.