↓ Skip to main content

Smell, think and act: A cognitive robot discriminating odours

Overview of attention for article published in Autonomous Robots, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Smell, think and act: A cognitive robot discriminating odours
Published in
Autonomous Robots, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10514-006-7098-8
Authors

Amy Loutfi, Silvia Coradeschi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 31%
Computer Science 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Materials Science 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,475,808
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Autonomous Robots
#131
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,656
of 64,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autonomous Robots
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.