You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Publisher Correction: Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-019-0449-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rainer Malik, Ganesh Chauhan, Matthew Traylor, Muralidharan Sargurupremraj, Yukinori Okada, Aniket Mishra, Loes Rutten-Jacobs, Anne-Katrin Giese, Sander W. van der Laan, Solveig Gretarsdottir, Christopher D. Anderson, Michael Chong, Hieab H. H. Adams, Tetsuro Ago, Peter Almgren, Philippe Amouyel, Hakan Ay, Traci M. Bartz, Oscar R. Benavente, Steve Bevan, Giorgio B. Boncoraglio, Robert D. Brown, Adam S. Butterworth, Caty Carrera, Cara L. Carty, Daniel I. Chasman, Wei-Min Chen, John W. Cole, Adolfo Correa, Ioana Cotlarciuc, Carlos Cruchaga, John Danesh, Paul I. W. de Bakker, Anita L. DeStefano, Marcel den Hoed, Qing Duan, Stefan T. Engelter, Guido J. Falcone, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Raji P. Grewal, Vilmundur Gudnason, Stefan Gustafsson, Jeffrey Haessler, Tamara B. Harris, Ahamad Hassan, Aki S. Havulinna, Susan R. Heckbert, Elizabeth G. Holliday, George Howard, Fang-Chi Hsu, Hyacinth I. Hyacinth, M. Arfan Ikram, Erik Ingelsson, Marguerite R. Irvin, Xueqiu Jian, Jordi Jiménez-Conde, Julie A. Johnson, J. Wouter Jukema, Masahiro Kanai, Keith L. Keene, Brett M. Kissela, Dawn O. Kleindorfer, Charles Kooperberg, Michiaki Kubo, Leslie A. Lange, Carl D. Langefeld, Claudia Langenberg, Lenore J. Launer, Jin-Moo Lee, Robin Lemmens, Didier Leys, Cathryn M. Lewis, Wei-Yu Lin, Arne G. Lindgren, Erik Lorentzen, Patrik K. Magnusson, Jane Maguire, Ani Manichaikul, Patrick F. McArdle, James F. Meschia, Braxton D. Mitchell, Thomas H. Mosley, Michael A. Nalls, Toshiharu Ninomiya, Martin J. O’Donnell, Bruce M. Psaty, Sara L. Pulit, Kristiina Rannikmäe, Alexander P. Reiner, Kathryn M. Rexrode, Kenneth Rice, Stephen S. Rich, Paul M. Ridker, Natalia S. Rost, Peter M. Rothwell, Jerome I. Rotter, Tatjana Rundek, Ralph L. Sacco, Saori Sakaue, Michele M. Sale, Veikko Salomaa, Bishwa R. Sapkota, Reinhold Schmidt, Carsten O. Schmidt, Ulf Schminke, Pankaj Sharma, Agnieszka Slowik, Cathie L. M. Sudlow, Christian Tanislav, Turgut Tatlisumak, Kent D. Taylor, Vincent N. S. Thijs, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Steffen Tiedt, Stella Trompet, Christophe Tzourio, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Matthew Walters, Nicholas J. Wareham, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, James G. Wilson, Kerri L. Wiggins, Qiong Yang, Salim Yusuf, Joshua C. Bis, Tomi Pastinen, Arno Ruusalepp, Eric E. Schadt, Simon Koplev, Johan L. M. Björkegren, Veronica Codoni, Mete Civelek, Nicholas L. Smith, David A. Trégouët, Ingrid E. Christophersen, Carolina Roselli, Steven A. Lubitz, Patrick T. Ellinor, E. Shyong Tai, Jaspal S. Kooner, Norihiro Kato, Jiang He, Pim van der Harst, Paul Elliott, John C. Chambers, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Andrew D. Johnson, Dharambir K. Sanghera, Olle Melander, Christina Jern, Daniel Strbian, Israel Fernandez-Cadenas, W. T. Longstreth, Arndt Rolfs, Jun Hata, Daniel Woo, Jonathan Rosand, Guillaume Pare, Jemma C. Hopewell, Danish Saleheen, Kari Stefansson, Bradford B. Worrall, Steven J. Kittner, Sudha Seshadri, Myriam Fornage, Hugh S. Markus, Joanna M. M. Howson, Yoichiro Kamatani, Stephanie Debette, Martin Dichgans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,166,076
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#6,616
of 7,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,611
of 351,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#56
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.